By Amanah Ramadiah, Domenico Di Gangi, D. Ruggiero Lo Sardo, Valentina Macchiati, Tuan Pham Minh, Francesco Pinotti, Mateusz Wilinski, Paolo Barucca and Giulio Cimini.


The paper, ‘Network Sensitivity of Systemic Risk’, explores how propagation dynamics depend on the topological details of an underlying network. It provides detailed understanding of the interplay between systemic risk measures and network structures, which provides central banks and regulators with new insights into how to reliably improve the structure of the financial system and reduce systemic risk. 


FNA’s Amanah Ramadiah and fellow researchers first consider various network topologies consistent with the balance sheets taken from financial institution data. 


The research then introduces a robust network sensitivity methodology to explore a range of weighted financial networks with varying densities. These variations cover sparse low-density networks to complete ones and apply two paramount models of both default contagion and distress contagion. Using this method, the team could then understand the differences in relative losses that different network structures, shocks and contagion mechanics can produce. 


By studying the different structures of the interbank network, Ramadiah et al. show how each impacts systemic risk. The research confirms that the systemic risk properties of a financial network are susceptible to its network features and demonstrates the complexity of the interbank system, noting that many variables determine a network’s resilience. 


The research also explores the block structure of the network to find that an assortative modular design works well to represent the market of several countries where home and foreign connectivity differ. However, financial networks usually take on a disassortative modular case. In both cases, the paper demonstrates how a shock from one block propagates to the other but does not reveal further discontinuity. The research suggests moving away from the pure bipartite case can slowly decrease systemic risk. 


Overall, Ramadiah et al. conclude that the outcome of a systemic event depends on the details of both the underlying network and the shock propagation.  The findings presented in the paper pave the way for more in-depth analysis and may help develop regulatory policies to improve the robustness of financial markets. 


Read the full paper here > 

More News

Why should commercial banks simulate the economic impact of retail CBDCs?

by Dr Carlos León and José Fernando Moreno Gutiérrez Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and other forms of digital money are here to stay. As intermediaries in the funding and payments ecosystems, commercial banks will see their business-as-usual activities affected. Commercial banks need quantitative insights into how they will be affected to thrive in this […]

The CBDC Broadcast Session #8

Aligning Technology with Policy: A look at the recent Oliver Wyman Forum and Amazon Web Services (AWS) Report Wednesday 10th August 2022, 14:00 (BST)   Guests Larissa De Lima from the Oliver Wyman Forum and Erica Salinas from Amazon Web Services will join FNA for Session #8 of the CBDC Broadcast, discussing the guests’ joint […]

Q&A: FNA’s Carlos León on how digital money can be more efficient and safe

By Lucas Mearian, Senior Reporter, Computerworld As more and more countries look to introduce Central Bank Digital Currencies. FNA’s Director of Financial Market Infrastructures and Digital Currency Solutions, Dr Carlos León, answers Computerworld’s questions on CBDCs, covering: The reasons why Central Banks are exploring the introduction of Digital Currencies The advantages CBDCs offer Potential technical […]
Copyright FNA © 2022 | Privacy Policy